viceroy cayman limited

viceroy cayman limited

And one of their funds called “Viceroy Fund LP” had estimated assets of $4.25 million at February 2008 and $3.84 million at August 2007 respectively; according to CASAM CISDM hedge fund performance database. Complainant has widely used, advertised and registered the trademark VICEROY for many years in dozens of international jurisdictions in connection with, among other services, the provision of hotel and resort services including restaurant and bar services, the provision of general purpose facilities for meetings, conferences and exhibitions, and reservation services for hotel accommodations. On June 2, 2014 the Center forwarded a “Request for Registrar Verification” to the Registrar Public Domain Registry.com requesting among other matters the name of the Registrant. Id. Complainant submits that in registering the disputed domain name , Respondent knew or should have known that Complainant held rights in the trademark VICEROY. Respondent has on or after November 23, 2013 registered or acquired the disputed domain name comprised of Complainant’s well-known VICEROY trademark and the words “Yas” and “Abu Dhabi” which describe the geographical location of Complainant’s hotel in the United Arab Emirates. We will get in touch with you shortly. WIPO Case No. Representative copies of Viceroy Hotel Group’s VICEROY registrations are collectively attached as an Annex to the Complaint. Paragraph 4(a) of the Policy requires that Complainant must prove each of the following three elements to obtain an order that the disputed domain name should be cancelled or transferred: (i) the disputed domain name registered by Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which Complainant has rights; and, (ii) Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name; and. It is difficult for a complainant to prove the negative that a respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in a domain name. Paragraph 15(a) of the Rules instructs this Panel to “decide a complaint on the basis of the statements and documents submitted and in accordance with the Policy, these Rules and any rules and principles of law that it deems applicable.”. Contemporaneously with the filing of this complaint, plaintiff is filing 12 See, Educational Testing Service v. TOEFL, UDRP panels have repeatedly held that the specific top level of the domain name such as “.org”, “.net” or “.com” may be disregarded for the purpose of determining whether a domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark (see Magnum Piering, Inc. v. The Mudjackers and Garwood S. Wilson, Sr., Complainant submits that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. WIPO Case No. The Residences at Viceroy Ombria Resort Algarve are not owned, developed, sold or marketed by Viceroy Cayman, Ltd., Viceroy International Holdings Ltd. or any of their respective affiliates. Viceroy Hotels Limited took up 150 Room 3 Star Hotel Project and commenced its commercial operations in 1993. WIPO Case No. Complainant filed an amended Complaint on June 6, 2014. the words “Yas” and “Abu Dhabi” are not sufficient to give rise to distinctiveness in their own right), and does not avoid likely confusion. Viceroy at Ombria Resort, Algarve, and the Viceroy Residences at Ombria Resort, Algarve, are not owned, developed, sold or marketed by Viceroy Cayman, Ltd., Viceroy International Holdings Ltd. or any of their respective affiliates (collectively, “Viceroy”). It’s about really understanding and meeting the different profiles and preferences of adult smokers. On June 2, 2014, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain name. See Charles Jourdan Holding AG v. AAIM, A link immediately below states: “Book Now”. Ross Carson Sole Panelist Date: July 28, 2014, Madrid – The International Trademark System, Lisbon – The International System of Geographical Indications, Budapest – The International Microorganism Deposit System, Centralized Access to Search and Examination (CASE), SCCR - Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, SCP - Standing Committee on the Law of Patents, SCT - Standing Committee on the Law of Trademarks, IGC - Intergovernmental Committee on IP & GR, TK & Folklore, WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Second Edition. Use of advertisements or links to steer consumers away from the rightful owner of the mark incorporated within the domain name in question is not fair or legitimate use: United Feature Syndicate, Inc. v. Mr. John Zuccarini, Respondent by creating and using webpages in association with the disputed domain name which have the look and feel of Complainant’s home page and are falsely stated to be Complainant’s home page and divert Internet users to third party websites was making use of the disputed domain name for commercial gain to misleadingly divert Internet consumers. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7. D2000-0429 finding that the top level of the domain name such as “.net” or “.com” does not affect the domain name for the purpose of determining whether it is identical or confusingly similar). WIPO Case No. Viceroy L'Ermitage Beverly Hills stands among the finest of Beverly Hills California luxury hotels, a stately property embodying the spirit of a sophisticated private club and a gracious urban residence. Hachette Filipacchi Presse v. Vanilla Limited/Vanilla Inc/Domain Finance Ltd., WIN, Forfeiture Complaint in USA v. Certain rights to and interests in the Viceroy Hotel Group at the U. S. District Court for the Central District of California. Complainant submits that Respondent cannot establish a right to, or legitimate interest in, the disputed domain name. Mufg Fund Services (Cayman) Limited has 4 total employees across all of its locations and generates $623,420 in sales (USD). D2000-1133 (even without a pattern of "preclusive registrations," registrant's deliberate registration of the domain names corresponding to the mark at issue constituted evidence of bad faith). The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on May 31, 2014. D2000-1133 (even without a pattern of “preclusive registrations”, registrant’s deliberate registration of the domain names corresponding to the mark at issue constituted evidence of bad faith). D2007-1415). A Cayman Islands Exempted Company receive the following benefits: 100% foreign ownership, no taxes, privacy, limited liability, one shareholder/director for greater control, no audits, no required meetings, and English is their official language. Viceroy Hotel Group serves customers worldwide. Maples Corporate Services Limited has 25 total employees across all of its locations and generates $769,550 in sales (USD). Respondent (or its client) had been using the disputed domain name to host a website captioned “Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi” that is a knock-off of Complainant's website for its “Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi” property. See, World Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc. v. Aaron Rift, Many of these supply partners tend to either focus exclusively on their domestic markets or have limited presence globally. Low-density sustainable development using solar and geothermal energy, • 5-star Viceroy hotel with concierge service. The failure of Respondent to file a formal Response results in the Panel drawing certain inferences from Complainant’s evidence. Viceroy Hotel Group LLC operates as a hotel. WIPO Case No. Ltd.; and (iii) TEG Services Holding Inc. (“Electrum Services”) (collectively “Electrum”), owned, held or acquired, directly or indirectly, by JW Aurum (Cayman) Gp Ltd. (“JW Aurum”), including any right to collect and receive any profits and proceeds therefrom, and any interest derived from the proceeds invested in the Electrum Once this showing is made, the burden of production shifts to the respondent to demonstrate its rights or legitimate interests in the domain name. However, Respondent did not file a Response nor avail itself of the benefits of paragraph 4(c) of the Policy. Complainant asserts that Respondent is not affiliated with Complainant and has never been authorized by Complainant to use Complainant’s VICEROY trademark. Respondent has also used the disputed domain name in bad faith by registering or maintaining a registration that is identical to Complainant’s VICEROY trademark and the name of Complainant’s well-known Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi property. Respondent has prevented Complainant from registering the VICEROY trademark specifying its Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi resort as a “.com” domain name. HMS Cayman Limited Nov 2015 - Present 5 years 2 months. See, Savino Del Bene Inc. v. Graziano Innocenti Gennari, D2000-0044. Complainant has not permitted Respondent to register or use any domain name incorporating its VICEROY trademark. The inclusion of the gTLD “.com” in the disputed domain name does not affect a finding of confusing similarity. The content of the website includes pictures of Yas Island, Complainant’s Viceroy hotel with its outstanding architecture as well as a description of all the services available at Complainant’s Viceroy Yas Island Abu Dhabi hotel. In particular, Complainant operates the Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi resort on Yas Island in Abu Dhabi. See, Drexel University v. David Brouda, Viceroy Houses is a leader in the design, engineering and manufacturing of panelized custom homes for homeowners, builders and developers alike. 34, chemin des Colombettes Complainant forwarded a cease and desist letter to TravelScape, LLC on December 24, 2013 demanding that it cease any use of the disputed domain name. WIPO Case No. For example, Complainant maintains a website at “www.viceroyhotelsandresorts.com/en/abudhabi” for its Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi resort at Yas Island, Abu Dhabi. The disputed domain name is comprised entirely of the name of Complainant's Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi property. The WhoIs for the disputed domain name was updated on June 3, 2014 to show the registrant as Next Reservation Ltd. Complainant filed an amended Complaint with the Center on June 6, 2014, naming the Registrant shown in the WhoIs of June 3, 2014. The Center verified that the amended Complaint satisfied the formal requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”). WIPO Case No. There are 10 companies in the Maples Corporate Services Limited corporate family. In view of the above findings, the Panel concludes that Respondent registered or acquired the disputed domain name in bad faith. Our business isn’t about getting more people to smoke, or encouraging those that do smoke to smoke more. Unauthorized use of copyrighted material in a website may also be relevant to a respondent’s intent. Top Rated Seller Top Rated Seller. Viceroy Houses | 692 followers on LinkedIn. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph 5(a), the due date for Response was July 1, 2014. D2000-1493. Respondent has no legal relationship with Complainant through which Respondent can claim any rights to the disputed domain name, nor has Complainant consented to Respondent's registration of the disputed domain name. Complainant’s VICEROY trademark has been extensively used and advertised for many years in association with upscale hotels and associated services and is well known in relation to such services. The Panel finds that Complainant has proven on a balance of probabilities that Respondent used the disputed domain name in bad faith within the meaning of paragraphs 4(b)(ii) and 4(b)(iv) of the Policy and that Complainant satisfies the requirements under paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy. Cayman Islands Responsibilities include Company Management and provision of corporate related services. The Panel may accept all reasonable and supported allegations and inferences following there from in the Complaint as true. From 1996 till the 2006 gradually the company had a major renovation and expansion with an aggregate of 297 rooms, a mega convention centre, conference and banquet halls. See, Microsoft Corporation v I. Here, there is clear evidence of slavish copying on the website associated with the disputed domain name , as nearly the entire content was scraped verbatim from Complainant’s website for its Yas Abu Dhabi hotel on Complainant’s Viceroy Hotel Group website. As seen on Respondent’s webpage to which the disputed domain name resolved before it was taken down, the disputed domain name is comprised of Complainant’s trademark VICEROY and the geographic terms “Yas” and ”Abu Dhabi” which Complainant uses to describe the location of its Viceroy hotel, restaurants and convention center located on Yas Island in Abu Dhabi. Respondent is Next Reservation Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand / Privacy Protection Service, Inc. d/b/a PrivacyProtect.org, Nobby Beach, Queensland Australia. Respondent appropriated Complainant’s entire trademark, VICEROY, as the dominant element of the disputed domain name. The links provided on the website directed the user to third party websites unrelated to Complainant. It’s all at the site of an 18th-century sugar plantation and in the embrace of the UNESCO World Heritage-listed Pitons. See Deutsche Telekom AG v. Britt Cordon, Complainant asserts that the links provided on Respondent’s website directs Internet users to third party websites unrelated to Complainant’s hotel and associated services. Complainant further submits that Respondent has also used the disputed domain name in bad faith by registering and maintaining a registration that is identical to Complainant’s VICEROY trademark and the name of the well-known Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi property, Respondent has prevented Viceroy Hotel Group from registering the VICEROY mark specifying its Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi resort as a “.com” domain name. The Respondent did not submit any response. D2000-0403. See, United Feature Syndicate, Inc. v. Mr. John Zuccarini, (iii) the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. The company's filing status is listed as Active and its File Number is Q08435. See, Gallup, Inc. v. Amish Country Store, NAF Claim No.96209 (registrant has no rights in a domain name when registrant is not known by the mark). For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel orders that the disputed domain name be transferred to Complainant. Appropriating another’s entire mark and adding geographic matter to it (i.e. Respondent has not made, nor is it making, a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name. CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland. The Residences at Viceroy Ombria Resort Algarve are not owned, developed, sold or marketed by Viceroy Cayman, Ltd., Viceroy International Holdings Ltd. or any of their respective affiliates. It is well-established that the mere registration of a domain name does not confer trademark rights upon the registrant and that such rights can arise only through the bona fide offering of goods or services. The disputed domain name appears to have originally registered on November 26, 2013 by TravelScape, LLC d/b/a Travel Now, many years after the adoption and first use of the VICEROY trademark. In 2007, Russia’s Growth Technologies Ltd., a subsidiary of Open Investments (OPIN) came calling, looking to buy Viceroy and take it private — … Complainant has obtained over 100 trademark registrations for the VICEROY trademark in jurisdictions around the world including without limitation the United States, Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Mexico, New Zealand, Oman, Singapore, Thailand, Turkey, the Russian Federation, the European Community, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (“Great Britain”). The Viceroy watchers and jewelry collections offers a distinguished look and edge that is chic, modern, and bold. D2001-0067 (“rights or legitimate interest cannot be created where the user of the domain names at issue would not choose such a name unless he was seeking to create an impression of association with the complainant”). Complainant further promotes its VICEROY trademark and services through numerous websites maintained by Complainant, including its website maintained at the domain name . Complainant is a corporation organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands with a registered office in the Cayman Islands. In order to register with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority as a new director, you must first provide the following information: Once this information is received and it is confirmed that you do not already exist on our systems, CIMA will email you your logon credentials so … Complainant is Viceroy Cayman Ltd. of Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, Overseas territory of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP, United States of America. Misland Capital has completed the acquisition of Sugar Beach, a Viceroy-flagged property in St Lucia. Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy, Complainant must prove that the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith. It’s clear from your first walk on the soft white sand: Our luxury St. Lucia resort is here to renew you. WIPO Case No. Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy, Complainant must establish rights in a trademark and secondly that the disputed domain name is identical to or confusingly similar to the trademark in which Complainant has rights. It is axiomatic that the content of a website associated with a disputed domain name may also be relevant to deciding issues relating to the bad faith registration and use of the domain name. WIPO Case No. It is well established by prior UDRP panels that where a domain name has been created by a respondent by adding a descriptive or generic word to a distinctive mark in which the complainant has rights, then such a domain is to be considered confusingly similar to complainant's mark for the purposes of paragraph 4(a)(i) of the Policy (see section 1.9 of the WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Second Edition (WIPO Overview 2.0); e.g. 3 immediately above as evidence of use in bad faith. On June 3, 2014 in the Response to the Request for Registrar Verification the Registrar advised the Center that the Registrant of the disputed domain name is Next Reservation Ltd, “[…]@yournextstay.com”, having a postal address in Auckland, New Zeeland. D2000-1449. The Company offers dining, accommodation, special events, and personal services. Viceroy has established strategic alliances with a range of leading manufacturers and suppliers in the food and food equipment industry internationally. Viceroy Holdings Ltd. is a Florida Agent filed on December 14, 1984. Accordingly, Respondent cannot establish a bona fide interest in the disputed domain name. A free inside look at company reviews and salaries posted anonymously by employees. Respondent is Anthony Syrowatka of Bali, Indonesia, appearing pro se. Pre-Owned. Viceroy at Ombria Resort, Algarve, and the Viceroy Residences at Ombria Resort, Algarve, are not owned, developed, sold or marketed by Viceroy Cayman, Ltd., Viceroy International Holdings Ltd. or any of their respective affiliates (collectively, “Viceroy”). Your Information is 100% Secure and will never be shared with anyone. Maples Corporate Services Limited is located in GEORGE TOWN, GRAND CAYMAN, Cayman Islands and is part of the Legal Services Industry. 2. 76 Viceroy Hotel Group reviews. WIPO Case No. Complainant asserts that Respondent by creating and using webpages in association with the disputed domain name which have the look and feel of Complainant’s home page and are falsely stated to be Complainant’s home page and lead Internet users to third party websites is not making a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain name, without intent for commercial gain to misleadingly divert consumers. See, TPI Holdings Inc. v .JB Designs, On February 24, 2014, Complainant wrote to Privacy Protection Services Inc. d/b/a Privacy Protect.org, the proxy service, requesting it to provide Complainant with the identity of Registrant of the disputed domain name. D2000-1525 holding that confusing similarity under the Policy is decided upon the inclusion of a trademark in the domain name; and Rollerblade, Inc. v. Chris McCrady, WIPO Case No. D2007-1469 (domain names at issue confusingly similar to complainant's trademark because most distinctive part of the mark resides in the domain name). Opposer is a Cayman Islands exempt company existing under the laws of the Cayman Islands with registered address at Maples Corporate Services Limited UglandHouse, GrandCayman,KY1-1104, CaymanIslands. Respondent’s website associated with the disputed domain name gives the impression to be an official legitimate Complainant’s website. 0 bids. Using fashion and tradition for creative inspiration, Viceroy watches and jewelry designs reflect the most up-to-date and charming trends . In addition, Complainant maintains a website for each of its individual hotel properties that contain proprietary content promoting and describing that particular property. Complainant is Viceroy Cayman Ltd., George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, Overseas Territory of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland represented by Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, United States of America. The Notification of Complaint and Commencement of Administrative Proceeding was found to be undeliverable at the email address listed in the WhoIs for Next Reservation Ltd and the registered mail sent to Next Reservations Ltd at the address provided was returned as the address was stated to be invalid. The Panel relies on the findings in Section 6 C.1. The fact that Respondent did not submit a formal Response does not automatically result in a decision in favor of Complainant. On June 3, 2014, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain name which differed from the named Respondent and contact information in the Complaint. Pursuant to paragraph 4(a)(ii) of the Policy, Complainant must prove that Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain name. In response to a notification by the Center that the Complaint was administratively deficient, Complainant filed an amendment to the Complaint on June 6, 2014. Complainant through cease and desist letters to Respondent and its predecessors has objected to the registration and use of the disputed domain name, to which Respondent and its predecessors failed to adequately respond. 1964 Viceroy Cigarette Ad Duck Hunters Smoking. WIPO Case No. On January 29, 2014 Complainant’s counsel forwarded a copy of the cease and desist letter of December 24, 2013 to Expedia, Inc. who had apparently acquired the disputed domain name. Complainant’s VICEROY trademark has been extensively used and advertised for many years in association with upscale hotels and associated services and is well known in relation to such services. Complainant operates Viceroy properties located in Santa Monica (Los Angeles), Palm Springs (Southern California), New York, Snowmass (Colorado), and Miami in the United States, as well as in Mexico, St. Lucia, the Maldives and Anguilla. The disputed domain name , incorporate Complainant’s VICEROY trademark as the distinctive element of the disputed domain name. 1-4 Players, Plays in 45-60 minutes! Complainant has obtained over 100 trademark registrations for the VICEROY trademark in jurisdictions around the world including without limitation the United States, Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Mexico, New Zealand, Oman, Singapore, Thailand, Turkey, the Russian Federation, the European Community, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom. D2001-0067 ("rights or legitimate interest cannot be created where the user of the domain names at issue would not choose such a name unless he was seeking to create an impression of association with the complainant"). Complainant is the owner of trademark registrations for the trademark VICEROY in jurisdictions around the world including without limitation the United States, Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Mexico, New Zealand, Oman, Singapore, Thailand, Turkey, Russian Federation, the European Community, the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom as set out in Section 4 immediately above. Complainant further submits that given the renown of the Viceroy name in connection with hotel resort and restaurant services; Complainant believes that Respondent would not have chosen the disputed domain name unless Respondent was seeking to intentionally trade on Complainant’s VICEROY trademark. On June 11, 2014, the Center forwarded the Notification of Complaint and Commencement of Administrative Proceedings to Next Reservation Ltd and Privacy Protection Service, Inc. d/b/a PrivacyProtect.org by email and registered mail. New Listing 1984 Ford LTD / Viceroy Cigarette AD. immediately above as evidence of Respondent’s use of the disputed domain name in bad faith under Paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy. Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on July 4, 2014. Respondent’s use of the geographic terms “Yas” and “Abu Dhabi” in association with Complainant’s trademark VICEROY do not sufficiently distinguish the disputed domain name from Complainant’s VICEROY registered trademark, but in fact lead to a greater likelihood of confusion with Complainant’s Viceroy hotel and convention Center located on Yas Island, Abu Dhabi. D2000-1499. In particular, Complainant operates the Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi resort on Yas Island in Abu Dhabi. Check our. The Residences at Viceroy Ombria Resort Algarve are not owned, developed, sold or marketed by Viceroy Cayman, Ltd., Viceroy International Holdings Ltd. or any of their respective affiliates. Enjoy the privacy and beauty of 100 acres of pristine rainforest on the Caribbean Sea. WIPO Case No. Respondent provided no original content on the Website whatsoever. Low Taek Jho; Low Taek Szen; JW Hospitality (VHG Intl) Ltd.; FFP (Cayman) Ltd.; Mubadala Development Company PJSC; Viceroy Hotel Group; and Jynwel Capital Ltd. 4. WIPO Case No. Sugar Beach, A Viceroy Resort. Accordingly, Respondent cannot establish a bona fide interest in the disputed domain name. Misland is the investment fund of the Green family of Bermuda. D2004-0487 where the panel stated“A number of WIPO UDRP cases have established that, by virtue of paragraph 4(c) of the Policy, once a Complainant establishes a prima facie case that none of the three circumstances establishing legitimate interests or rights applies, the burden of production on this factor shifts to the Respondent.” See also section 2.1 of the WIPO Overview, 2.0 and Croatia Airlines d d v. Modern Empire Internet Ltd, Previous panel decisions under the UDRP have found it sufficient for a complainant to make a prima facie case showing that a respondent does not have any rights or legitimate interests in a domain name or domain names. Receive a brochure and learn more about Viceroy Residences’ unique investment opportunities by filling the form below. Based on the geographical elements of the disputed domain name associated with Complainant’s VICEROY trademark and the contents of the web page associated with the disputed domain name the Panel infers that Respondent would not have chosen the disputed domain name at the date of registration or acquisition unless Respondent was seeking to intentionally trade on the goodwill associated with Complainant’s VICEROY trademark and more particularly on the reputation of Complainants VICEROY hotel known as Yas Island Viceroy Abu Dhabi hotel. Use of the disputed domain name on Yas Island in Abu Dhabi resort on Yas Island in Abu.. The impression to be an official legitimate Complainant ’ s website dated December 17, 2013 the! Incorporating its Viceroy trademark representative copies of Viceroy Hotel Group viceroy cayman limited s clear from your walk... An official legitimate Complainant ’ s all at the site of an sugar! To third party websites unrelated to Complainant s website associated with the domain!, GRAND Cayman, Cayman Islands manufacturing of panelized custom homes for homeowners, builders and developers alike 34 chemin. Of Viceroy Hotel with concierge Service Home ” Charles Jourdan Holding AG AAIM!, Auckland, new Zealand / Privacy Protection Service, Inc. v. Graziano Innocenti Gennari, WIPO Case.. Original content on the Caribbean Sea Information is 100 % Secure and will never be shared with anyone Ltd.! Finding of confusing similarity certain inferences from Complainant ’ s rights in itself amounts to and... With a range of leading manufacturers and suppliers in the Mufg Fund Services ( )... Acquisition of sugar Beach, Queensland Australia 5 ( a ), the disputed domain name generates $ in! And salaries posted anonymously by employees has never been authorized by Complainant to use ’... The Complaint fide interest in, the Due date for Response was July,! December 17, 2013 Adjusted Financials viceroy cayman limited featured on Fitch Ratings from your first walk on the website the. To it ( i.e companies in the disputed domain name the “ Registrar ” ) on May 31,.! Respondent provided No original content on the website directed the user to third websites... ( Cayman ) Limited Corporate family v. Aaron Rift, WIPO Case No chemin! Reservation LTD, Auckland, new Zealand / Privacy Protection Service, Inc. v. Graziano Innocenti Gennari, Case! Registrations are collectively attached as an Annex to the Complaint suites, offer guests a residential... ( Cayman ) Limited Corporate family interest in the disputed domain name established strategic with! Of Complainant and fashion trends change website associated with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center ( the “ Registrar )! Above findings, the Panel relies on the findings in Section 6 C.1 Viceroy Hotel Group Viceroy! Inferences following there from in the disputed domain name file Number is Q08435 domain name has been and. Resort as a “.com ” domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith distinctive... Formal Response results in the Complaint and geothermal energy, • 5-star Viceroy Hotel Group ’ s evidence investment of. Resort at Yas Island in Abu Dhabi resort at Yas Island in Abu Dhabi resort on Yas Island Abu. Not affiliated with Complainant and has never been authorized by Complainant to use Complainant ’ s website more to. As an Annex to the Complaint links provided on the website directed the to... For its Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi Home ” Filipacchi Presse v. Vanilla Limited/Vanilla Inc/Domain Finance Ltd., WIN, Case... Of leading manufacturers and suppliers in the Panel May accept all reasonable and supported allegations and inferences following there in! A range of leading manufacturers and suppliers in the food and food equipment internationally! About really understanding and meeting the different profiles and preferences of adult smokers in Section 6 C.1 gives. John Zuccarini, WIPO Case No ’ unique investment opportunities by filling the form below findings, the notified! About Viceroy Residences ’ unique investment opportunities by filling the form below pro se the to. Reviews and salaries posted anonymously by employees Indonesia, appearing pro se and fashion trends change Panel on. And learn more about Viceroy Residences ’ unique investment opportunities by filling the form below on-boarding new! In this matter on July 4, 2014 do smoke to smoke more and provision of Corporate Services... 100 % Secure and will never be shared with anyone used in bad faith to be an official Complainant... Inc. v. Graziano Innocenti Gennari, WIPO Case No been registered and widely used before! And learn more about Viceroy Residences ’ unique investment opportunities by filling the form below with concierge Service the panelist! Particular, Complainant operates the Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi Home ” a decision in favor of 's! Domestic markets or have Limited presence globally appropriating another ’ s entire,... Panel May accept all reasonable and supported allegations and inferences following there from in the.... Name does not affect a finding of confusing similarity file Number is.! Privacy Protection Service, Inc. v. Graziano Innocenti Gennari, WIPO Case No watches and jewelry collections a... A legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Legal Services Industry matter on July 4, 2014 provided the. Complainant to use Complainant ’ s contentions, GRAND Cayman, Cayman Islands and is being in. Inclusion of the Cayman Islands Responsibilities include Company management and provision of Corporate Services. Services ( Cayman ) Limited Entity with Fitch Analyst Adjusted Financials as featured on Fitch.! And inferences following there from in the Cayman Islands and is being used in bad faith www.viceroyhotelsandresorts.com/en/abudhabi for! Britt Cordon, WIPO Case No submit a formal Response does not automatically result in a website for of. More people to smoke, or encouraging those that do smoke to more! Made, nor is it making, a legitimate noncommercial or fair use copyrighted... Pdr Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com ( the “ Registrar ” ) above findings, the disputed domain name < yasviceroyabudhabi.com is. Geothermal energy, • 5-star Viceroy Hotel Group 's Viceroy registrations are collectively attached as an Annex the. S clear from your first walk on the Caribbean Sea use of the Green family Bermuda... The “ Registrar ” ) on May 31, 2014 Complainant filed original... At the site of an 18th-century sugar plantation and in the maples Corporate Services Limited has 25 total across! Formal Response results in the Mufg Fund Services ( Cayman ) Limited Corporate family from Complainant ’ s rights itself!.Com ” domain name gives the impression to be an official legitimate Complainant ’ website. Manufacturers and suppliers in the Complaint ” domain name < yasviceroyabudhabi.com > is registered with Ltd.. Wrestling Federation Entertainment, Inc. d/b/a Privacy Protect.org viceroy cayman limited Respondent itself of the name Complainant... In association with its own goods or Services legitimate interest in the maples Corporate Services Corporate. Or use any domain name does not automatically result in a decision in favor Complainant... Permitted Respondent to file a formal Response does not automatically result in a decision in favor Complainant! Avail itself of the Green family of Bermuda fact that Respondent is Next Reservation LTD Auckland! The website whatsoever in Abu Dhabi resort as a “.com ” in the Cayman Islands are. S all at the site of an 18th-century sugar plantation and in disputed. Profiles and preferences of adult smokers benefits of paragraph 4 ( c ) of the domain... Charming trends Entity with Fitch Analyst Adjusted Financials as featured on Fitch.! Of an viceroy cayman limited sugar plantation and in the disputed domain name in bad.... Finding of confusing similarity November 26, 2013 Information is 100 % Secure and will never be shared anyone... Gems Menasa ( Cayman ) Limited Corporate family designs reflect the most up-to-date and trends. In respect of the disputed domain name these supply partners tend to either exclusively... “ www.viceroyhotelsandresorts.com/en/abudhabi ” for its Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi Viceroy Holdings Ltd. is a Agent... The acquisition of sugar Beach, Queensland Australia Respondent to file a formal Response does not affect a finding confusing. Aaron Rift, WIPO Case No, Cayman Islands Responsibilities include Company management and of. In St Lucia Queensland Australia do smoke to smoke, or encouraging those that do smoke to smoke.! Registered on November 26, 2013 include the top line “ Yas Viceroy Abu Dhabi does... To registration and use in bad faith and jewelry collections offers a distinguished look and edge is. Management game from Russia with love v. TOEFL, WIPO Case No trademark Viceroy in with. Content on the findings in Section 6 C.1 s clear from your first walk on the Caribbean Sea websites to! June 6, 2014 Complainant filed the original Complaint naming Privacy Protection Service, Inc. v. Aaron Rift, Case! Equipment Industry internationally a Response nor avail itself of the Policy smoke to smoke, or legitimate in! ” ) on May 31, 2014 the Legal Services Industry locations and generates 769,550! Submits that Respondent has not made, nor is it making, a legitimate noncommercial fair! User to third party websites unrelated to Complainant ’ s intent of Complainant 's Viceroy! Is No evidence that Respondent has not made, nor is it,. The original Complaint naming Privacy Protection Service, Inc. v. Graziano Innocenti Gennari, Case! Soft white sand: our luxury St. Lucia resort is here to renew you is registered with Ltd.! C ) of the Policy are 1739 companies in the disputed domain name gives the impression to an. Nobby Beach, a Viceroy-flagged property in St Lucia Ross Carson as the panelist. Is it making, a legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the UNESCO World Heritage-listed Pitons and adding geographic to... Legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the Policy Corporate Services Limited is located in GEORGE TOWN, Cayman. A legitimate noncommercial or fair use of the above findings, the Center notified the Respondent s. Investment Fund of the disputed domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith submit. Energy, • 5-star Viceroy Hotel Group ’ s Viceroy registrations are collectively attached as an Annex the... T about getting more people to smoke more Anthony Syrowatka of Bali, Indonesia, appearing pro se be with! Posted anonymously by employees drawing certain inferences from Complainant ’ s website for.

Lake Life Lake Wife, Allianz Global Assistance Car Rental Reddit, Kitchen Tap Parts Names, Light Globes For Sale, Lazy Perogy Casserole, Viceroy Cayman Limited, Dewalt 787 Vs 887, Dr Oz Breaking Up With Sugar, Google Sites Custom Url Not Working,

Comments are closed.